babyblue
Active Member
Registered: 15/05/06
Posts: 9
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #1 |
WOW! I never knew a small pic of a girl topless could cause such concern! Guess WHAT! On two other writers' sites I visit I saw comments about my "DISGUSTING" Avatar (pic). on this site. One even said she TOTALLY REFUSED to read ANYTHING on here as it was nothing but pornography and for pedophiles. I reckon they must be the SADDEST people going if a quite natural pic of part of a person's body actually OFFENDS them to such a degree. What do any other readers think? |
| |
TeenageVenus
Prolific Poster
Registered: 07/05/06
Posts: 26
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #2 |
No. Why should it. The only people it seems to offend are religeous nutters and the HOLIER THAN THOU crowd which follow blindly the parsons, priests and preachers who are mostly pedophiles themselves. I was tempted to say, "What a nice pair of Baby Bluetits."  
|
| |
kaytlin_69
Active Member
Registered: 13/03/07
Posts: 1
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #3 |
I think nudity is a very normal part of life...if those religious freaks can't deal with that then that's their problem... GO NUDITY!!!
__________________
 round and round and round she goes, where she stops, nobody knows!! |
| |
redhead
Moderator
Registered: 07/05/06
Posts: 55
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #4 |
Hiya, and welcome . What say we all post a nudy pic of us and an erotic story  , I'm up for it if you other gals are . What sad lives they must lead - but I bet even if they ain't had a guy they played with a carrot or something  .# I know I'm wicked but those hypocrits get right up my sweet little nose. |
| |
buba8167
Active Member
Registered: 19/04/07
Posts: 5
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #5 |
I think it depends on the purpose of the person being in the nude.
If it's for some kind of art, then no I'm not against it. (like the picture here)
It it's for something along the lines of Pornography, then yes, I am against it.
|
| |
Felmaster
Active Member
Registered: 10/06/07
Posts: 1
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #6 |
You should specify your "religious nutters", I am of the Wiccan mind and have no problem with nudity. Christians now probably would. |
| |
TeenageVenus
Prolific Poster
Registered: 07/05/06
Posts: 26
|
|
|
Reply with quote | #7 |
Quote: You should specify your "religious nutters", I am of the Wiccan mind and have no problem with nudity. Christians now probably would.
Being Wiccan doesn't mean you may or may not be a religious freak/nutter - any more than being a Jew or of the Muslim faith does.
There are good and bad in all forms of society. Unfortunately, some are less tolerant of what others may or may not believe, and even though their faith is (supposedly) based on love of the particular deity/deities or whatever they worship, and of fellow creatures, many are happy to murder anyone that appears not to agree with their beliefs - and any of their own faith that happens to be in the vicinity.
From the tone of your remark it seems that being a Wiccan does not stop you apparently 'jumping to conclusions', or thinking that no Wiccans should be considered weirdos, and religious nutters.
Of the many I know, the vast majority are nice enough people. (I consider them silly for believing, just as i do anyone that follows a religion), however, I accept their rights to their beliefs, and accept their right to feel sorry for myself and other non-believers.
I certainly don't have any desire to blow them to bits because they are Wiccan - or RC, or or C of E, or whatever.
I DO know a couple of them that can hardly be classed by normal people as anything other than 'nutters' though .
So anyway - welcome , and at least you made a comment - that is what threads are all about.
|
| |
